In Janeites on Sunday, Nancy Mayer wrote the following, attempting to rebut my and others's claims that Jane Austen's Sharade on James I……
“His
Majesty was of that amiable disposition which inclines to Freindship, and in
such points was possessed of a keener penetration in discovering Merit than
many other people. I once heard an excellent Sharade on a Carpet, of which the
subject I am now on reminds me, and as I think it may afford my Readers some
amusement to FIND IT OUT, I shall here take the liberty of presenting it to
them.
SHARADE
My first is what my second was to King James the 1st, and you tread on my whole.
The principal favourites of his Majesty were Car, who was afterwards created Earl of Somerset and whose name perhaps may have some share in the above mentioned Sharade, and George Villiers afterwards Duke of Buckingham...." END QUOTE
SHARADE
My first is what my second was to King James the 1st, and you tread on my whole.
The principal favourites of his Majesty were Car, who was afterwards created Earl of Somerset and whose name perhaps may have some share in the above mentioned Sharade, and George Villiers afterwards Duke of Buckingham...." END QUOTE
…was indeed an intentional dirty joke
on the part of the 15 year old Jane Austen:
Nancy: "We tried to discuss
Unbecoming Conjunctions n this list some time ago. I think the only thing on
which we agreed is that if we believe
Heydt Stevenson, the books are forever
changed and one would have to make an effort to keep them out of the hands of
children. They would be more akin to Fanny Hill and Peyton Place than
stories suitable for all ages."
Nancy’s reference to Fanny Hill rang a distant bell in
my memory in relation to Jane Austen’s Sharade, and now I have had a chance to check back in my files, and I find that several years ago, it occurred to me to check
to see whether Jane Austen just might
have been making one of her patented covert literary allusions when she chose to have
"carpet" be the answer to her Sharade.
Sure enough, I had hit a bull's eye
a long while back, when I came across the following famous passage in Cleland's
Fanny Hill: [ALERT! The following
passage is typical Cleland stylish
euphemism vividly describing sexual
acts]
"Slipping, then, aside the
young man's shirt, and tucking it under his cloaths behind, he shewed to the open
air those globular fleshy eminences that
compose the Mount Pleasants of Rome, and which now, with all the narrow vale that intersects them, stood
displayed and exposed to his attack nor could I without a shudder behold the
disposition he made for it. First, then,
moistening well with spittle his instrument,
obviously to make it glib; he pointed, he introduced it, as I could plainly discern, not from its direction, and
my losing sight of it, but by the
writhing, twisting, and soft murmured complaints of the young sufferer; but at
length, the first straights of entrance being pretty well got through,
everything seemed to move and go pretty currently on, AS ON A CARPET ROAD,
WITHOUT MUCH RUB OR RESISTANCE; and now, passing one hand round his minion's hips, he got hold
of his red-topped ivory toy, that stood perfectly stiff, and
shewed, that if he was like his mother behind, he was like his father before;
this he diverted himself with, whilst with the other he wantoned with his hair,
and leaning forward over his back, drew his face, from which the boy shook the
loose curls that fell over it, in the posture he stood him in, and brought him towards
his, so as to receive a long breathed kiss; after which, renewing his driving,
and thus continuing to harass his rear, the height of the fit came on with its
usual symptoms, and dismissed the action."
END QUOTE
This passage is famous, at least
among literary scholars, because it is the "climactic" part of THE
most notorious passage in Fanny Hill, i.e.,
it is the scene in which an older man has his way with a younger man, as
Fanny covertly observes in horrified fascination. There is a fascinating story
about this passage, in terms of the uproar that it caused in 1750, and
Cleland's editing it out of a subsequent edition, if memory serves me right.
Anyway, it does not require any leap
at all to see how this passage relates to Jane Austen's Sharade on James I--in
fact, the parallels could not be closer! It is obvious that the 15 year old
Jane Austen was
already very familiar with the above
passage in Fanny Hill, and she tailor-made her Sharade in order to capitalize
on the totally random correspondence between "Carr" and
"carpet", and to bring to the mind of a close reader of Fanny Hill this
exact parallel!
And so once again, Nancy, you have provided
me with an invaluable service, by reminding me of the most probative part of my
argument in favor of Jane Austen's youthful Sharade being about James I's
sexual relationship with his favourite Carr.
Jane Austen knew that those reading
her Sharade could wonder, is it possible this teenaged girl is writing such a
dirty Sharade? And, because she always played fair with her readers, she
provided a giant wink---the thinly veiled allusion to Cleland's "carpet
road"---in order to confirm to the knowing reader that, yes, this was
indeed entirely intentional!
Now,
please read on to Part Two….
http://sharpelvessociety.blogspot.com/2013/02/jane-austens-carpet-sharade-on-james_27.html
… for
significant additional corroboration of my claim of intentional allusion by the
youthful Jane Austen to Cleland’s Fanny Hill.
Cheers,
ARNIE
@JaneAustenCode
on Twitter
P.S. Jane Austen, with her characteristic principle of "deniability", provided a rationale for understanding the answer of "Carpet" to her Sharade with a PG rating, so to speak, because there was an expression, "carpet knight" with Elizabethan origins (Sir Toby Belch in Twelfth Night refers to Sir Andrew Aguecheek as being "on carpet consideration", and here is how an 1862 Notes & Query entry defines the term:
"The carpet knight is a term characteristically applied to those who obtained their honours "with unhacked rapier and on carpet consideration"... amidst the holiday gifts of their sovereign, rather than bravely acquired on the field of battle, or boasting a prescriptive claim by proving victorious at a tournament."
So, Robert Carr was a carpet knight in that sense, but also in the sexual sense that Jane Austen so clearly hinted at.
P.S. Jane Austen, with her characteristic principle of "deniability", provided a rationale for understanding the answer of "Carpet" to her Sharade with a PG rating, so to speak, because there was an expression, "carpet knight" with Elizabethan origins (Sir Toby Belch in Twelfth Night refers to Sir Andrew Aguecheek as being "on carpet consideration", and here is how an 1862 Notes & Query entry defines the term:
"The carpet knight is a term characteristically applied to those who obtained their honours "with unhacked rapier and on carpet consideration"... amidst the holiday gifts of their sovereign, rather than bravely acquired on the field of battle, or boasting a prescriptive claim by proving victorious at a tournament."
So, Robert Carr was a carpet knight in that sense, but also in the sexual sense that Jane Austen so clearly hinted at.
No comments:
Post a Comment