5 ½
years ago, I wrote the following passing comment about resonance I noticed between
Romeo & Juliet and Pride & Prejudice:
“It
is interesting to think about Juliet's parents pressuring her to marry Paris,
the way Mrs. Bennet pressures Lizzy to marry Mr. Collins; and Darcy and Lizzy,
like Romeo & Juliet, meeting at a big dance, but [then the contrast of] how
JA depicts Lizzy and Darcy being mutually attracted, but fighting it from the
start, [whereas Romeo & Juliet immediately fall for each other].”
At
that time, I searched, and was very surprised to find only one Austen scholar
who had ever recognized any sort of veiled allusion to R&J in P&P—Park Honan,
who in his 1989 Austen bio, wrote:
“Darcy's
visible disgust with a Meryton society lacking in grace, culture and variety
has deeply allied him with her at first. 'Nay, gentle Romeo, we must have you
dance,' Mercutio had said in Romeo and
Juliet. Mr. Bingley's first words to Darcy echo the Shakespearean scene:
"Come, Darcy," said he, "I must have you dance. I hate to see
you standing about by yourself in this stupid manner. You had much better
dance."…Darcy, like Romeo, is a self-obsessed spectator, and Bingley is
like Mercutio the reveler…”
Then,
in 2014, while posting about the allusion to Romeo & Juliet that I detected in Persuasion, I noted, in passing, yet another Darcy-Romeo parallel:
“I
have often posted about JA’s sexual puns on the word “pen”, and I am also far
from the first to point to the phallic resonance of Wentworth’s “pen” which
drops, and the debate about who holds the “pen”, etc., in Persuasion, and also, e.g., in Darcy’s preference to “mend” his
“own pen”, despite Caroline’s offer to do it for him. Well, R&J also has an amazing sexual pun on “pen”
in a similar masturbatory sense when we first hear [from Montague], in Act 1,
Scene 1, about [his son] Romeo pining away for Rosaline before he meets Juliet:
Many
a morning hath he there been seen,
With tears augmenting the fresh morning dew.
Adding to clouds more clouds with his deep sighs;
But all so soon as the all-cheering sun
Should in the furthest east begin to draw
The shady curtains from Aurora's bed,
Away from the light steals home my heavy son,
With tears augmenting the fresh morning dew.
Adding to clouds more clouds with his deep sighs;
But all so soon as the all-cheering sun
Should in the furthest east begin to draw
The shady curtains from Aurora's bed,
Away from the light steals home my heavy son,
AND
PRIVATE IN HIS CHAMBER PENS HIMSELF
Shuts up his windows, locks far daylight out
And makes himself an artificial night:
Black and portentous must this humour prove,
Unless good counsel may the cause remove.
Shuts up his windows, locks far daylight out
And makes himself an artificial night:
Black and portentous must this humour prove,
Unless good counsel may the cause remove.
As I
look back today at the above with the benefit of 5 ½ years of hindsight, I now add
another strong parallel I see between Shakespeare’s tragic lovers and Austen’s
romantic lovers: that the relationships between the two couples both ignite and
progress in defiance of the strong opposition of powerful family members
(Juliet’s parents and Lady Catherine, respectively).
And I
also notice an irony in the history of English literature, which is that, in
2016, Elizabeth and Darcy, and Romeo and Juliet, are regularly mentioned in the
same breath, as both being at the top of the general reading public’s list of the
most romantic fictional couples. And yet, other than Honan’s brief catch, and
my own short contributions, above, despite diligent searching the past 2 days, I
can’t find, in the past two centuries of Austen criticism, any other detections
of JA, in 1812-3, writing P&P with Shakespeare’s great early romantic
tragedy in mind as one of her many literary allusive sources.
I
mention all this because the other day I fortuitously happened upon yet another
striking and specific textual parallel between R&J and P&P --- one which
is so obvious, that it has me
slapping my head “Duh!” for not noticing it sooner, given that I’ve studied
both texts very carefully over the years. It is a very specific parallel between
Juliet’s Nurse and Mrs. Bennet----two characters who, when you think about it,
could not be more similar, right? --- a textual parallel which, I claim, cannot
possibly have arisen by chance. Let’s see what you think.
Please
first read the following passage, in which the Nurse engages in sharp, but
playful, repartee with the Capulet household servant Peter, immediately after
Mercutio has just mocked the Nurse’s appearance while engaging in very pointed
sexual repartee:
NURSE An a' [i.e., Mercutio] speak any thing against
me, I'll take him down, an a' were lustier than he is, and
twenty such Jacks; and if I cannot, I'll find those that
shall. Scurvy knave! I am none of his flirt-gills; I am none of his skains-mates. And thou must stand by too, and suffer every knave to use me at his pleasure?
PETER I saw no man use you a
pleasure; if I had, my weapon should quickly have been out,
I warrant you: I dare draw as soon as another man, if I see
occasion in a good quarrel, and the law on my side.
NURSE Now, afore God, I
AM SO VEXED, THAT EVERY PART ABOUT ME QUIVERS. Scurvy knave! …
Surely
every Janeite reading the ALL CAPS portion of the Nurse’s last line in that
excerpt immediately made the connection to Mrs. Bennet’s agitated statements to
Elizabeth and Jane about Lydia’s elopement with Wickham, right after the former
has just arrived back at Longbourn from Pemberley with the Gardiners:
“…And,
above all, keep Mr. Bennet from fighting. Tell him what a dreadful state I am
in, that I am frighted out of my wits—and have such TREMBLINGS, such FLUTTERINGS,
all over me—such SPASMS in my side and pains in my head, and such BEATINGS at
heart, that I can get no rest by night nor by day….”
Notice
not only the striking parallelism of language between the Nurse’s and Mrs.
Bennet’s speeches, but also the striking parallelism of context on not one, but
seven different points---i.e., both of
these speeches are spoken by (1) an older woman (2) who is a “mother” to the heroine, an older
woman who (3) unrestrainedly and graphically (4) complains about her nervous
psychosomatic symptoms, and then, as part of the conversation, (5) the topic of
an older man close to that older woman (6) fighting a duel with (7) a smooth-talking
young buck, is raised.
And I’d be remiss not to add that “vexed” is not
only the verb which Juliet’s Nurse uses to describe her emotions which
accompany her “quiverings”, it just happens to be Mrs. Bennet’s favorite verb to describe her own
feelings during all those memorable moments when her “nerves” pay her a visit,
as we see in the following four passages (the last one being Jane Austen’s
narrator describing Mrs. Bennet’s feelings):
"Mr.
Bennet, how can you abuse your own children in such a
way? You take delight in VEXING me. You have no compassion for my poor NERVES."
“…First
of all, he asked Miss Lucas. I was so VEXED to see him stand up with her! “
"I
beg you would not put it into Lizzy's head to be VEXED by his ill-treatment,
for he is such a disagreeable man, that it would be quite a misfortune to be
liked by him….”
She
was now in an IRRITATION as violent from delight, as she had ever been FIDGETY
from alarm and VEXATION.
Now,
of course, I acknowledge that there is also an enormous contrast here---even a
reversal--between these two passages, Shakespeare’s and Austen’s. The R&J passage
involves the Nurse’s comic raillery at an early stage of the story, when there’s
no imminent threat of the tragedy to come when (another parallel to R&J in
P&P) two impetuous young lovers scheme to get out of town and live together
elsewhere in defiance of community mores. Conversely, in P&P, Mrs. Bennet is
seriously upset at the elopement, which portends social tragedy for the Bennet
family, as to which Mr. Collins (inadvertently parodying Juliet’s suicide) observes
“The death of your daughter would have been a blessing in comparison of this.”
Based
on all of those parallels, I believe there can be no reasonable doubt that Jane
Austen meant to pointedly remind her readers of Juliet’s inimitable Nurse when
she wrote that memorable dialog for the equally inimitable Mrs. Bennet. In that
regard, other Austen scholars, including myself, have previously noticed and
described the subliminal allusive presence of Juliet’s Nurse in the psyches of
both Mrs. Norris and Miss Bates—both of them sharing the Nurse’s garrulous
verbosity and intrusiveness—but for some odd reason, nobody before me the other
day has noticed that Mrs. Bennet is actually the most direct descendant of Juliet’s
Nurse.
And I
also wonder whether Jane Austen also meant for us to notice the following
Miss-Bingley-like sexual innuendoes by Mercutio to the lovesick Romeo….
I
conjure thee by Rosaline's BRIGHT EYES,
By her high forehead and her scarlet lip,
By her fine foot, straight leg and QUIVERING THIGH (Shakespeare’s wink at the Nurse’s quiverings)
And the demesnes that there adjacent lie,
That in thy likeness thou appear to us!
By her high forehead and her scarlet lip,
By her fine foot, straight leg and QUIVERING THIGH (Shakespeare’s wink at the Nurse’s quiverings)
And the demesnes that there adjacent lie,
That in thy likeness thou appear to us!
…when
we repeatedly hear in P&P about Darcy’s fascination with Elizabeth’s fine,
brightened eyes.
I
conclude by pointing out that the allusion to Romeo & Juliet which is so powerfully tagged in Mrs. Bennet’s
nervous vexations, takes on much, much greater significance still, when viewed
through the lens of the dark shadow story of P&P I’ve been sketching out during
the past decade. Most of all, there’s a troubling parallel between Romeo and
the dark Darcy of the shadow story of P&P, which, as I initially noted, is
winked at in their sharing both an initial reluctance to dance at big balls, as
well as a penchant for solitary “mending” of their respective “pens”.
In “Wherefore
Art Thou Tereu? Juliet and the Legacy of Rape” in Renaissance Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 1 (Spring 2005), pp. 127-156,
Robert N. Watson and Stephen Dickey persuasively spell out the numerous literary
allusions which Shakespeare slyly wove into the character of Romeo, which all
converge on the very disturbing and anti-romantic image of Romeo as a predatory
rapist instead of lovestruck young man.
I see
Elizabeth’s married life with Darcy as a parody of Juliet’s tragic death,
because it will be no walk in the park for her to be married to the dark Darcy of
the shadow story, who does not actually repent and reform after she rejects his
first proposal, but merely pretends to do so, because he is a man who cannot
take no for an answer, and who does not hesitate to use his considerable
resources to stage an extended experience for Elizabeth during the latter half
of P&P, which destroys her (healthy) resistance to him.
But
if you find that a door you don’t wish to walk through with me today, then I
hope at least that you will still enjoy the comic pleasure of thinking about
Mrs. Bennet and Juliet’s Nurse, as Austen’s and Shakespeare’s “sisters” in
vexed quiverings!
Cheers,
ARNIE
@JaneAustenCode
on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment