Tomorrow,
I’ll be back to reveal the common connection to Jane Austen’s satire of the
Prince Regent (aka the Prince of W-h-ales) which I claim unites all those
seemingly unconnected passages I quoted from Emma the other day. In the interim, I give you some questions about
four of those quoted passages, the answers to which may make that connection more
visible (and some of you may recall my past posts about these quoted passages):
Ch. 43:
"Oh!
for myself, I protest I must be excused," said Mrs. Elton; "I really cannot attempt—I am not at all
fond of the sort of thing. I had an acrostic once sent to me upon my own name,
which I was not at all pleased with. I knew who it came from. An abominable puppy!—You
know who I mean (nodding to her husband).
Who is the
“abominable puppy” Mrs. Elton refers to, why doesn’t she name him, how does her
husband know who she means, and why does Mrs. Elton’s reference to “an
abominable puppy” echo the Trinculo’s descriptions of the “monster” Caliban in The Tempest, 2.2?:
CALIBAN
I'll kiss thy foot; I'll swear myself thy
subject.
STEPHANO
Come on then; down, and swear.
TRINCULO
I shall laugh myself to death at this puppy-headed
monster. A most scurvy monster! I could find in my heart to beat him,--
STEPHANO
Come, kiss.
TRINCULO
But that the poor monster's in drink: an abominable
monster!
Ch. 49:
"Time,
my dearest Emma, time will heal the wound.—Your own excellent sense—your
exertions for your father's sake—I know you will not allow yourself—." Her
arm was pressed again, as he added, in a more broken and subdued accent,
"The feelings of the warmest friendship—indignation—abominable scoundrel!"—And in a louder, steadier
tone, he concluded with, "He will soon be gone. They will soon be in
Yorkshire. I am sorry for her.
She deserves a better fate."
As to Knightley’s
second sentence, who is Knightley talking about, why doesn’t he name him, and
why does Knightley speak it in “a more subdued accent” that his direct
statements to Emma?
Ch. 39:
In the
few minutes' conversation which [Emma] had yet had with [Frank], while Harriet
had been partially insensible, he had spoken of her terror, her naivete, her
fervour as she seized and clung to his arm, with a sensibility amused and
delighted; and just at last, after Harriet's own account had been given, he had
expressed his indignation at the abominable folly of Miss Bickerton in the warmest
terms.
What is
the meaning of the echoing between the verbiage of the above passage and that
of the above two previously quoted passages (in Chapters 43 & 49)?
Ch. 20 “…Manners
were all that could be safely judged of, under a much longer knowledge than
they had yet had of Mr. Churchill. [Jane] believed every body found his manners
pleasing."
Emma could not forgive her.
Ch. 21 Emma
could not forgive her; --but as neither provocation nor resentment were
discerned by Mr. Knightley, who had been of the party, and had seen only proper
attention and pleasing behaviour on each side…
What
does Jane Austen mean by having the anadiplosis of “Emma could not forgive her”
(that bridges Chapters 20 & 21) strongly echo the following famous passage
in her 02/16/13 letter [Letter 82] to Martha Lloyd about “the Princess of Wales”?:
“I suppose all the World is sitting in
Judgement upon the Princess of Wales’s Letter. Poor Woman, I shall
support her as long as I can, because she is a Woman, &
because I hate her Husband—but I can hardly forgive her for calling herself
“attached & affectionate” to a Man whom she must detest..I do not know what
to do about it; but if I must give up the Princess, I am resolved at least
always to think that she would have been respectable, if the Prince had behaved
only tolerably by her at first.”
Cheers,
ARNIE
@JaneAustenCode
on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment