After
sending my earlier message, I did a little followup Googling, and found the
following very interesting factoid in Colleen Sheehan's Persuasions Online article
about the "Prince of Whales" solution to the "courtship"
charade in Emma:
"As
for Harriet Smith, “the natural daughter of somebody,” the mystery of her
parentage is resolved in the last chapter of the novel. Born 23 June 1796 (Midsummer’s Eve), her
nondescript surname leads one to suspect that it may not be her real name. On the other hand, it is interesting to note
that Smythe was the maiden name of Maria Fitzherbert. Harriet’s parentage is revealed on August 12th,
the birthday of the Prince Regent."
\Undoubtedly,
that was intentional on JA's part--Colleen did not have, however, any idea that
Harriet's birthday was actually a significant event, because of her
inheritance.
But reading
that prompted me to go back to Ellen's calendar, and sure enough, here is the
entry for August 12:
"Harriet
tells tale to Emma, all "unintelligible" to Emma; Harriet's parentage
discovered, 55:462. We should remember Harriet's last words: "now I seem
to feel that I may deserve him; and that if he does choose me, it will not be
any thing so very wonderful", 47:407."
Here
is fuller textual context from Harriet’s speech to Emma in Chapter 47:
"I
never should have presumed to think of [Knightley as a suitor] at first,"
said she, "but for you. You told me to observe him carefully, and let his
behaviour be the rule of mine—and so I have. But now I seem to feel that I may
deserve him; and that if he does chuse me, it will not be any thing so very
wonderful."
Notice
the “now”---although Emma is utterly clueless about Harriet having just
inherited a lot of money, clearly Harriet is well aware of this fact, and that
is why, given that Harriet is also well aware that Knightley is cash poor, that
“it will not be any thing so very wonderful” if Knightley might want to marry
Harriet for her money!
And….just
to be clear about the full import of my last post----this hidden fact of
Harriet’s reaching the crucial age of inheritance (isn’t that exactly what
happens in a couple of Burney’s novels as well?) explains perfectly why Harriet
would play the role of ditzy fool for 46 chapters, kissing Emma’s butt ten
times an hour----but then would suddenly reveal her true self, as a variant of Lucy
Steele, but in very deep undercover mode. Once Harriet had her inheritance,
there was no reason for the disguise any longer, and so, ironically, in the
chapter that begins “Poor Harriet!”, it’s actually poor EMMA who is getting a
major splash of ice cold water thrown over her own narcissistic fantasies of superiority.
It’s Harriet who no longer needs to bother with Emma, not the reverse.
Amazing
stuff, isn’t it?
Cheers,
ARNIE
@JaneAustenCode
on Twitter
ADDED 15 MINUTES LATER:
ADDED 15 MINUTES LATER:
I
just reread my posts, and realized that in my rush, I had overlooked that Ellen
DID indeed recognize that June 23 was both the date of the Donwell Abbey outing
AND Harriet's birthday. Sorry about that, Ellen!
However, while Ellen correctly understood that this was an intentional interlocked hidden calendar code created by Jane Austen, she did not realize it had implications and significance that would reverberate like a loud church bell through the entire structure of the shadow story of Emma.
However, while Ellen correctly understood that this was an intentional interlocked hidden calendar code created by Jane Austen, she did not realize it had implications and significance that would reverberate like a loud church bell through the entire structure of the shadow story of Emma.
No comments:
Post a Comment