This
post is a brief followup to my post yesterday...
...about the surprisingly close parallels between the scene in P&P when Jane sends news of the elopement of Lydia & Wickham to Eliza in two stages, and the scene in Persuasion when the Lyme contingent sends news of Louisa’s fall to the Musgrove parents in two stages.
...about the surprisingly close parallels between the scene in P&P when Jane sends news of the elopement of Lydia & Wickham to Eliza in two stages, and the scene in Persuasion when the Lyme contingent sends news of Louisa’s fall to the Musgrove parents in two stages.
I
concluded my last post with this observation: “So, based on these three strong
parallels, I am now convinced that Jane Austen definitely had Chapter 46 of
P&P firmly in mind as she wrote that initially quoted paragraph in Persuasion, but chose to present a
similar situation in a subtler, more understated way in Persuasion, leaving more unstated, to be figured out by the
ingenious reader---and this also perhaps reflects a growing authorial command
gained by JA during the three years since P&P was published, such that she
was willing to experiment in different ways of giving her readers the
experience of the ambiguity that arises constantly in the messiness of real
life.”
After
writing that, I realized I had only skimmed the surface, as several other surprising,
even more thematic parallels between these two passages popped out at me. They’re
not only about the breaking of bad news, in stages, about an event occurring at
a distance—in both cases, that bad news also
involves all six of the following parameters:
(1) an
impulsive young woman
(2)
takes sudden, unexpected risky actions while
(3) she
is being enticed/encouraged by
(4) a
dashing military suitor whom
(5)
the heroine (i.e., not the impulsive young woman) is or has been infatuated or
in love, resulting in
(6) the
impulsive young woman’s fall, whether literal (Louisa) or metaphorical (Lydia).
And
laying out those six points of close correspondence immediately led me to
recognize a third candidate for inclusion in this Austenian inter-novel karass (Kurt Vonnegut’s term for “a network or group of people who, unknown to themselves, are somehow
affiliated or linked…”)—Marianne Dashwood!
In
S&S, Marianne (1) is an impulsive young woman who (2) takes a couple of sudden
risky actions while she (3) has been enticed/encouraged by a (4) dashing “military”
suitor (Willoughby, who, while not in the military like Wickham and Wentworth,
is a hunter, rider, and marksman with a cavalryman’s skills, to whom (5) [some
Austen scholars, including myself, believe that] the heroine (Elinor) is
unconsciously attracted, resulting in (6) both a literal (ancle-sprain) and
metaphorical (pregnancy?) “fall”.
And
even in regard to the other earlier-noted “breaking bad news” parallel I saw between
P&P and Persuasion, there is a
near hit as well with Marianne. I.e., the delivery to Mrs. Dashwood of the bad
news about Marianne’s dangerous illness might well have progressed in two
progressively worse stages, had Marianne died before Brandon brought Mrs. D to
Cleveland. The narrator makes this clear to us:
“…within half an hour after
Willoughby's leaving the house, she was again called down stairs by the sound
of another carriage.—Eager to save her
mother from every unnecessary moment's horrible suspense, she ran
immediately into the hall, and reached the outward door just in time to receive
and support her as she entered it.
Mrs. Dashwood, whose terror as they drew near the house had produced almost the
conviction of Marianne's being no more, had no voice to inquire after her,
no voice even for Elinor…”
So…the
question raised by these three scene “triplets” in three different Austen
novels, spanning her entire novel output, is: why would she repeat the pattern
so closely three times, involving three characters whose personalities differ
amongst themselves? One possibility that occurs to me, based on my experience
looking behind comparable patterns in the past, is that this was a veiled allusion
to (a) some event in the history of JA’s immediate family, and/or (b) some
event in one of the literary works JA had on her allusive radar screen (e.g.,
those in the Bible, or in the writings of Shakespeare, Richardson, Burney,
Radcliffe, etc) that fits this same pattern?
But I
am also interested to hear other speculations explaining what I have found.
Cheers,
ARNIE
@JaneAustenCode
on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment