A
month ago, I wrote my first post…. http://tinyurl.com/hqwy3f7 ... about Jane Austen’s
shocking veiled allusion to the Earl of Rochester John Wilmot’s infamous, Restoration-Era,
X-rated poem “A Ramble in St. James’s Park” . In that post, and in two followup
posts since then, I’ve identified and explained Austen’s textual hints comprising
that subliminal allusion, in particular Austen’s specific pointers to Wilmot’s
poem title.
That
title is the reason, I suggest, why Sir William Lucas just can’t stop talking,
in code, to Darcy about “dancing” at “St. James’s”—he’s reminding Darcy that he
knows what Darcy does when he’s in London, even if Eliza does not. And that’s
also the reason why Jane Austen’s narrator repeats the very unusual word “ramble”
four times in P&P, all of them referring to Eliza Bennet and her well-known
love of walks in the country—Jane Austen keeps pinging the naughty Earl’s very
naughty poem, as we follow her delightful, but clueless, heroine on her beloved
nature walks.
Three
of those usages occur in the latter half of the novel, to describe Eliza’s
walks at Rosings, Pemberley, and Longbourn, respectively, during all of which
Darcy either shows up suddenly, or else Wickham does, and then the only topic
is….Darcy! But I’m here today to revisit the first one, which occurs early in
the novel, in Chapter 10, when Lizzy, the Bingley sisters, and Darcy stroll in
the Netherfield shrubbery, and this time I present the entire passage, because
it all turns out to be critical to understanding of JA’s full meaning:
“[Miss
Bingley] often tried to provoke Darcy into disliking her guest, by talking of
their supposed marriage, and planning his happiness in such an alliance.
"I
hope," said she, as they were walking together in the shrubbery the next
day, "you will give your mother-in-law a few hints, when this desirable
event takes place, as to the advantage of holding her tongue; and if you can
compass it, do cure the younger girls of running after officers. And, if I may
mention so delicate a subject, endeavour to check that little something,
bordering on conceit and impertinence, which your lady possesses."
"Have
you anything else to propose for my domestic felicity?"
"Oh!
yes. Do let the portraits of your uncle and aunt Phillips be placed in the
gallery at Pemberley. Put them next to your great-uncle the judge. They are in
the same profession, you know, only in different lines. As for your Elizabeth's
picture, you must not have it taken, for what painter could do justice to those
beautiful eyes?"
"It
would not be easy, indeed, to catch their expression, but their colour and
shape, and the eyelashes, so remarkably fine, might be copied."
At
that moment they were met from another walk by Mrs. Hurst and Elizabeth
herself.
"I
did not know that you intended to walk," said Miss Bingley, in some
confusion, lest they had been overheard.
"You
used us abominably ill," answered Mrs. Hurst, "running away without
telling us that you were coming out."
Then
taking the disengaged arm of Mr. Darcy, she left Elizabeth to walk by herself. The
path just admitted three. Mr. Darcy felt their rudeness, and immediately said:
"This
walk is not wide enough for our party. We had better go into the avenue."
But
Elizabeth, who had not the least inclination to remain with them, laughingly
answered:
"No,
no; stay where you are. You are charmingly grouped, and appear to uncommon
advantage. The picturesque would be spoilt by admitting a fourth.
Good-bye."
She
then ran gaily off, rejoicing as she RAMBLED about, in the hope of being at
home again in a day or two….” END QUOTE
I’m
revisiting the above passage today, because of something truly extraordinary
that I learned with the unwitting yet invaluable assistance of Prof. Laurie
Kaplan, former editor of Persuasions.
Her 2012 Persuasions article, “Sunday in the Park with Elinor
Dashwood: ‘So Public a Place’, is primarily about Elinor
Dashwood’s “ramble” in Kensington Gardens in the very unwelcome company of the
motormouth Anne Steele. However, what arrested my attention yesterday was my reading
Kaplan’s brief excursus about London’s oldest public park, St. James’s Park, as
I continued my routine followup to my discovery a month ago of that major
allusion in P&P to “A Ramble in St. James’s Park”:
“During
the reigns of the Stuarts, St. James’s Park was acclaimed as the fashionable
place to ride and to be seen, particularly in the summer when the lanes were
crowded with exquisitely dressed people “coaching” in modish equipages. The
King’s Old Road to Kensington, or Rotten Row (route du roi), “was the bon ton’s
rendezvous”. In the reign of Queen Anne this park had become “notorious for
prostitutes [Boswell later frequented this park] and for the depredations of
those ruffianly aristocrats known as Mohocks”…The Mohocks were a gang of “young
bloods” who roamed the park accosting men and women. They did not steal money,
but they disfigured their male victims and sexually assaulted their female
victims. St. James’s Park was safe neither by day nor by night.”
So
far, nothing extraordinary, but now we come to the information Kaplan
unearthed, which frankly, blew my mind:
“The
feature that drew visitors to [St. James’s] park was the herd of cows residing
there. In a radical return to country values, St. James’s Park offered fresh
milk served twice a day. With cows meandering over the grass and across the
lanes, the landscape of St. James’s Park was a challenge for women’s dresses.
In Burney’s novel, Evelina is dismayed by her Sunday walk in St. James’s Park:
she complains that the Mall “is a long straight walk, of dirty gravel, very
uneasy to the feet”. Notorious for its dirty lanes and sexual violence, St.
James’s Park would have been too unpleasant and threatening a location for Mrs.
Jennings, in her position as chaperone, to suggest to Elinor as an appropriate
place for a Sunday afternoon excursion. Nor would this park have appealed to
Jane Austen herself, whose own experience walking in a public garden in March
was so pleasant, her observations regarding the early blooming lilacs and horse
chestnuts so particular. The potential disruption caused by marauders and cows
would have made the tête-à-tête between Miss Steele and Elinor virtually
impossible. In addition, the reverberating calls of “A Can of Milk, Ladies; A
can of Red Cow’s Milk, Sir” would have been a comic interruption into Miss
Steele’s monologues…. “
So,
what does that description of what were, during the Restoration (and, I’d
guess, for a long while afterwards?) the famous and dirt-generating cows of St.
James’s Park, have to do with the passage from the end of Chapter 10 of P&P
that I quoted at the top of this post?
EVERYTHING!!!.....as
I will now explain.
Elizabeth’s
laughing, parting shot at Darcy and the Bingley sisters as she “rambles” off
is:
"No,
no; stay where you are. You are charmingly grouped, and appear to uncommon
advantage. The picturesque would be spoilt by admitting a fourth.
Good-bye."
Why
does Elizabeth laugh? Because, as many knowledgeable Janeites know today, and
as Austen scholars have known for a very long time, her bon mot would have been recognized immediately by the cognoscenti of the Regency Era as a witty
satire on Revd. Gilpin’s very famous dictum about the picturesque: “Cattle are so large that
when they ornament a foreground, a few are sufficient. Two cows will hardly
combine. Three make a good group- either united- or when one is a little
removed from the other two. If you increase the group beyond three, one of more
in proportion must necessarily be a little detached .This detachment prevents
heaviness and adds variety…”
As
you now can put all the pieces together, you must see what blew my mind--- it
turns out that even as Eliza laughs at her own Gilpinesque witticism, the joke
is actually on her, because Jane Austen’s narrator, by referring to Eliza’s “ramble”,
is alerting the knowing reader that Eliza has inadvertently referred to the
famous cows of St. James’s Park!
Poor
country-girl Elizabeth has no clue that Darcy (and perhaps the Bingley sisters
as well) are actually familiar with those cows in St. James’s Park, as they
have had their share of evening “rambles” there. And poor Eliza, whose dirty
(and very odorous) petticoats are the subject of such raillery in the
Netherfield salon, after she has traversed many cow pastures to get there from
Longbourn, is also inadvertently conjuring up, in the dirty mind of Caroline Bingley,
the dirty paths in St. James’s Park which Burney’s Evelina complains about. So
the joke about dirty petticoats is deeper, and sharper, than has previously
been understood by readers of P&P.
But
that’s not the worst of it. There’s something even worse than all of that, in
this inadvertent allusion by Elizabeth to the X-rated poetry of the Earl of
Rochester. Jane Austen has given Elizabeth’s older sister Jane Bennet the exact same name as the notorious madam
who supplied the working girls to fill out the guest list at the Earl’s famous naked
“private ball”.
This
would have suggested to the knowledgeable Regency Era reader (who’d have known
about the life and the writings of the Earl, and who might even have read
Gilpin’s-----yes, that same Gilpin with the famous four cows!-----1798 biographical
essay about the profane life and sacred death of the Earl of Rochester) that
Jane—saintly Jane---has, unbeknownst to her beloved sister, been “rambling” in
St. James’s Park with Darcy during her previous visits to stay with the
Gardiners in London.
And
it makes sense, for another reason, to connect Gilpin and his picturesque
theorizing to “A Ramble in St. James’s Park”—I will let Heather Touet, a grad
student, explain:
“A
strange dichotomy is seen in Rochester’s “A Ramble in St. James’s Park” where
we read of the beautiful setting playing host to some decidedly unbeautiful
visits. Rochester's lines play with the two sides of the park - the romantic
and the depraved - as seen in the first stanza where his picturesque
descriptions are punctuated with vile acts:
Picturesque
verses
Lewd verses
Poor pensieve lover in this place, Would frig upon his mother's face;
Whence rows of mandrakes tall did rise, Whose lewd tops f----ked the very skies.
Each imitative branch does twine, In some loved fold of Aretine.
And nightly now beneath their shade, Are buggeries, rapes, and incests made.
Whence rows of mandrakes tall did rise, Whose lewd tops f----ked the very skies.
Each imitative branch does twine, In some loved fold of Aretine.
And nightly now beneath their shade, Are buggeries, rapes, and incests made.
In
his poem, Rochester mimics the beauty of the park hiding the sinful acts by
prefacing his vulgar lines with lines describing the attractions of the park.
On the surface, the park appears to recreate the countryside in the city,
but on a closer reading it has become as corrupt as the rest of London.” END QUOTE
FROM TROUET ARTICLE
And
that leads me to revisit my final assertion in my post a month ago, i.e., that
the unnamed poetic suitor for the 15 year old Jane Bennet, whom Mrs. Bennet
refers to in Chapter 9 of P&P, was none other than Darcy himself---the Earl
of Rochester in metaphorical disguise, if you will---and the “verses” he wrote while
wooing Jane were none other than….“A Ramble in St. James’s Park”!
Recognizing
the picturesque cows of St. James’s Park lurking beneath Lizzy’s Gilpinesque witticism
at Netherfield Park also goes a long way toward explaining the following sharp exchange
between Mrs. Bennet and Mr. Darcy, which immediately precedes that discussion
of poetry. Just
read the passage as if Mrs. Bennet and Darcy were discussing, in code, his randy
rambles in St. James Park, and we can understand why Darcy “looks at her for a
moment, before “silently turning away”:
"The
country," said Darcy, "can in general supply but a few subjects for
such a study. In a country neighbourhood you move in a very confined and
unvarying society."
"But
people themselves alter so much, that there is something new to be observed in
them for ever."
"Yes,
indeed," cried Mrs. Bennet, offended by his manner of mentioning a country
neighbourhood. "I assure you there is quite as much of that going
on in the country as in town."
Everybody
was surprised, and Darcy, after looking at her for a moment, turned silently
away. Mrs. Bennet, who fancied she had gained a complete victory over him,
continued her triumph.
"I
cannot see that London has any great advantage over the country, for my part,
except the shops and public places. The country is a vast deal pleasanter, is
it not, Mr. Bingley?"
"When
I am in the country," he replied, "I never wish to leave it; and when
I am in town it is pretty much the same. They have each their advantages, and I
can be equally happy in either."
"Aye—that
is because you have the right disposition. But that gentleman," looking at
Darcy, "seemed to think the country was nothing at all."
This
coded conversation about what Hamlet would call “country matters” will always
fly right over Elizabeth’s head in the world of P&P, but, after today, it
need not ever again fly over the heads of real life readers of Pride & Prejudice who know the code!
Cheers,
ARNIE
@JaneAustenCode
on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment