When I concluded my argument in my previous post......
....with the following observation....
"I am not the first to see the obvious repeated lampooning of Clarke in
the above paragraph. However, this lampooning takes on startling new
significance when we think about it in light of Sanditon's initial
scenes being set in Clarke's home village--what it suggests to me is
that perhaps the "novel" for which JA has created this delightfully zany
"plan" is none other than Sanditon, the very first novel she began after
writing this "Plan of a novel"! Among other things, it makes me realize
that there must have been another Mr. Collins-like clergyman in the back
of JA's mind as she contemplated Volume 2 of Sanditon, a character who
would have had all the deliciously foolish traits of James Stanier
Clarke himself. "
....I had not stopped to think about what JA had already written in the
fragment of Sanditon that survives. But once I did, I immediately
realized that JA had indeed already provided us with a character who
was, although disguised in the "mask" of a dissolute worthless rake, the
shockingly close likeness of James Stanier Clarke himself, i.e., Sir
Look at what Sir Edward has to say (colored of course by the narrator's
sardonic commentary on his opinions) on James Stanier Clarke's favorite
subject--the criteria for a great novel:
“The Novels which I approve are such as display Human Nature with
Grandeur -- such as shew her in the Sublimities of intense Feeling --
such as exhibit the progress of strong Passion from the first Germ of
incipient Susceptibility to the utmost Energies of Reason
half-dethroned, -- where we see the strong spark of Woman's Captivations
elicit such Fire in the Soul of Man as leads him (though at the risk of
some Aberration from the strict line of Primitive Obligations) -- to
hazard all, dare all, atcheive all, to obtain her. -- Such are the Works
which I peruse with delight, & I hope I may say, with Amelioration. They
hold forth the most splendid Portraitures of high Conceptions, Unbounded
Views, illimitable Ardour, indomitible Decision -- and even when the
Event is mainly anti-prosperous to the high-toned Machinations of the
prime Character, the potent, pervading Hero of the Story, it leaves us
full of Generous Emotions for him; -- our Hearts are paralized. --
T'were Pseudo-Philosophy to assert that we do not feel more enwrapped by
the brilliancy of his Career, than by the tranquil & morbid Virtues of
any opposing Character. Our approbation of the Latter is but
Eleemosynary. -- These are the Novels which enlarge the primitive
Capabilities of the Heart, & which it cannot impugn the Sense, or be any
Dereliction of the character, of the most anti-puerile Man to be
"If I understand you aright", said Charlotte, "our taste in Novels is
not at all the same."
And here they were obliged to part -- Miss Denham being too much tired
of them all to stay any longer. -- The truth was that Sir Edward, whom
circumstances had confined very much to one spot, had read more
sentimental Novels than agreed with him. His fancy had been early caught
by all the impassioned, & most exceptionable parts of Richardson’s; &
such Authors as have since appeared to tread in Richardson’s steps, so
far as Man's determined pursuit of Woman in defiance of every opposition
of feeling & convenience is concerned, had since occupied the greater
part of his literary hours, & formed his Character. -- With a perversity
of Judgement, which must be attributed to his not having by Nature a
very strong head, the Graces, the Spirit, the Sagacity, & the
Perseverance, of the Villain of the Story outweighed all his absurdities
& all his Atrocities with Sir Edward. With him, such Conduct was Genius,
Fire & Feeling. -- It interested & inflamed him; & he was always more
anxious for its Success & mourned over its Discomfitures with more
Tenderness than could ever have been contemplated by the Authors.
Though he owed many of his ideas to this sort of reading, it were unjust
to say that he read nothing else, or that his Language were not formed
on a more general Knowledge of modern Literature. -- He read all the
Essays, Letters, Tours, & Criticisms of the day -- & with the same
ill-luck which made him derive only false Principles from Lessons of
Morality, & incentives to Vice from the History of its Overthrow, he
gathered only hard words & involved sentences from the style of our most
approved Writers." END QUOTE
Can there be any doubt that this was a free translation, if you will, of
the pompous, overblown, narcissistic idiotic, and ultimately
un-Christian literary advice which Clarke gives to JA in his letters?
And...upon further reflection, and consideration of Sir Edward Denham's
impassioned defense of Robert Burns's somewhat unsavory love life, is it
not highly probable that this was JA's coded way of lampooning the
hypocrisy of Clarke's service as court librarian and chaplain to the
Prince Regent, a man whose life of dissolution and debauchery made
Robert Burns seem like an innocent schoolboy by comparison?
So, I now argue that any remaining doubt that anyone had after reading
my preceding post about Clarke's being covertly depicted in Sanditon via
the village name "Willingden" should, I believe, be laid to rest by the
And we can only wonder what it would have been like had JA finished
Sanditon and had added another Clarke "doppelganger" who actually was a
clergyman, and had then put Sir Edward Denham in the same room with that
clergyman----it would have been like crossing the streams in
Ghostbusters---very bad indeed!
@JaneAustenCode on Twitter
P.S.: By the way, I am NOT the first person to notice the parallelism
between Sir Edward's polemic about grand novels and Clarke's friendly
advice about the same subject--Laura Mooneyham White writes about these
two passages as both being similar in their "world-making", and Juliette
Wells in 2010 pointed out that the historical novelist Amanda Elyot
(pseudonym for Leslie Carroll) used passages from both Sir Edward and
Clarke as epigraphs for the first chapter of _By A Lady_ (a 2006 time
travel pastiche about Jane Austen)---but neither White nor Carroll nor
Wells apparently had the slightest clue that these passages were similar
because JA intended them to be!
- Deirdre Le Faye & Me: "I am a scholar, she is a scholar: so far we are equal"
- Darcy's "We neither of us perform to strangers": a Radical New Interpretation
- The Hunger Games’s Veiled Allusion to Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus
- August Wayne Booth in Once Upon A Time: Jane Austen Really IS Everywhere in 2012!
- 20 shades of hero/villain Mr. Darcy
- The Great Gadsby: an overnight lesbian feminist ‘comedy’ sensation 10+ years in the making (& 3 millenia overdue)
- Rick Santorum would have been the worst person in the world to Jane Austen too!
- Austenland: The Movie was Fun, but the Novel was Better [SPOILER ALERT as to both]
- The secret codeword Shakespeare devilishly hid in plain sight in Romeo & Juliet that Shakespeare Uncovered DIDN’T uncover—but John Milton (and then I) did!
- Veiled Allusions in Friends With Benefits--Who'd Have Thunk it?!