For those who think I exaggerate when I claim that Jane Austen's Shakespeare obsession was lifelong and intense, that she was the greatest Shakespeare scholar in the history of literary scholarship even though she never published a word of literary criticism, per se, and that she instead repeatedly demonstrated her mastery of Shakespeare by alluding, in a complex and global fashion, to a large number of Shakespeare's plays in all her novels, such as....
(Twelfth Night & Pride & Prejudice)
http://sharpelvessociety.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-complex-hidden-allusion-to.html (As You Like It & Emma)
http://sharpelvessociety.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-complex-concealed-allusion-to.html (As You Like It & Sense & Sensibility)
http://sharpelvessociety.blogspot.com/2013/07/jane-austens-fanny-prices-remembrances.html (Hamlet & Mansfield Park)
http://sharpelvessociety.blogspot.com/2011/06/jane-austens-allusions-to-loves-labours.html (Love's Labour's Lost & Emma)
(Much Ado About Nothing & Pride & Prejudice)
(The Merchant of Venice & three Austen novels)
(Troilus & Cressida & Mansfield Park)
http://sharpelvessociety.blogspot.com/search?q=Hamlet+Northanger (Hamlet & Northanger Abbey)
These are just a sampler, highlights of what I have found of Jane
Austen's Shakespeare obsession---there are a number of others I have not
yet written about publicly, and when you add all of them up, these are
just _my_ discoveries.
To these must then be added all the many mainstream Austen scholarly
articles and book chapters about a number of _other_ Austen allusions to
Shakespeare plays which have been identified by sharp elves like
Jocelyn Harris, Marcia McClintock Folsom, Isobel Armstrong, Stephen
Derry, H.R. Harris, et al, most notably the Mansfield Park allusions to
King Lear, Henry VIII and All's Well That Ends Well, the Sense &
Sensibility allusions to Measure for Measure and Hamlet, the Emma
allusion to Midsummer Night's Dream, the Persuasion allusion to Othello,
etc etc. etc..
John Wiltshire did a pretty good job in 2001 of summarizing
then-published Austen-Shakespeare connections in a chapter in his book
Recreating Jane Austen; but as you can discern from what I have
presented above, what Wiltshire covers is literally a drop in the bucket
of what Jane Austen was actually up to vis a vis Shakespeare. It is an
ocean of allusion.
I mention all this because of something I came across this morning which
I had never really noticed before, a passage in Love & Freindship,
written when Jane Austen was not yet 16 years old. I'll just reproduce
it here, I think it speaks for itself in terms of where the 15 year old
Jane Austen's head was at in terms of Shakespeare:
"As soon as we had thus happily disencumbered ourselves from the weight of
so much Money, we began to think of returning to our Mothers, but
accidentally hearing that they were both starved to Death, we gave over
the design & determined to engage ourselves to some strolling Company of
Players, as we had always a turn for the Stage. Accordingly we offered our
Services to one & were accepted; our Company was indeed rather small, as
it consisted only of the Manager his Wife & ourselves, but there were
fewer to pay and the only inconvenience attending it was the Scarcity of
Plays which for want of People to fill the Characters, we could perform.
We did not mind trifles however.
One of our most admired Performances was
Macbeth, in which we were truly great. The Manager always played Banquo
himself, his Wife my Lady Macbeth, I did the Three Witches & Philander
acted all the rest. To say the truth this tragedy was not only the Best,
but the only Play we ever performed; & after having acted it all over
England, Ireland, and Wales, we came to Scotland to exhibit it over the
remainder of Great Britain. " END QUOTE
Just imagine to yourself a 15 year old country girl with no formal
education and no access to a worldclass library, producing the above,
and writing about the characters in one of Shakespeare's tragedies as
casually as if she were describing some local friends--think of the
degree of easy familiarity that is implied, which must have been based
on a great deal of private reading and reflection on what she had read.
By age 15.
In Mansfield Park, we read:
"It will be a favourite, I believe, from this hour," replied Crawford;
"but I do not think I have had a volume of Shakespeare in my hand before
since I was fifteen. I once saw Henry the Eighth acted, or I have heard of
it from somebody who did, I am not certain which. But Shakespeare one gets
acquainted with without knowing how. It is a part of an Englishman's
constitution. His thoughts and beauties are so spread abroad that one
touches them everywhere; one is intimate with him by instinct. No man of
any brain can open at a good part of one of his plays without falling into
the flow of his meaning immediately."
So...is it just a coincidence that Jane Austen at age 38 created a
character who speaks about reading Shakespeare at age 15, and getting
acquainted with Shakespeare without knowing how, almost as though a deep
knowledge of Shakespeare was built into the Magna Carta, or slipped
into spruce-beer when no one was looking? No, of course not, Jane Austen
is speaking through the mouth of Henry Crawford, talking about herself
at 15, writing the above passage in Love & Freindship, demonstrating
an already substantial familiarity with Shakespeare.
And of course, this idea of magical osmosis of knowledge of Shakespeare
which Henry Crawford throws out there so glibly, is total nonsense, and
is meant to be understood as such by readers who pause and think about
it for 10 seconds.
The truth is that Jane Austen, great genius that she was, nonetheless
must have devoted a humongous amount of sustained study over nearly 30
years in order to become the world-class Shakespeare scholar she became,
in order to so thoroughly absorb and transmute the gold of Shakespeare
into the gold of Austen. Henry Crawford's speech should be read in the
same vein as one should read Jane Austen's letters to James Stanier
Clarke, in which she refers to her own writing in a minimizing,
dismissive way. It's all a massive put-on.
In this case, the beauty and depth of Jane Austen's appropriations of
Shakespeare for her novels are that rare substance--gold which really
does "glister". And when you choose the Jane Austen cup, you find that
it is filled to the brim with a very powerful Shakespearean brew.
P.S.: I wonder if Alan Cumming--whom we all know as Mr. Elton in the
Paltrow Emma- and who recently played all the roles in Macbeth on
Broadway in a one man show, was aware that Jane Austen at age 15
imagined a performance of Macbeth in which an actor of an itinerant
group of strolling players played all the roles in Macbeth except
Banquo, Lady Macbeth, and the Three Witches.
P.P.S.: I bet that Jane Austen insisted on playing Lady Macbeth in any Steventon theatrical
production of Macbeth, or else, if someone else (like Eliza de Feuillide) snagged Lady M first,
then JA must have made sure to play one of the Witches.
- Deirdre Le Faye & Me: "I am a scholar, she is a scholar: so far we are equal"
- Darcy's "We neither of us perform to strangers": a Radical New Interpretation
- The Hunger Games’s Veiled Allusion to Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus
- August Wayne Booth in Once Upon A Time: Jane Austen Really IS Everywhere in 2012!
- 20 shades of hero/villain Mr. Darcy
- The Great Gadsby: an overnight lesbian feminist ‘comedy’ sensation 10+ years in the making (& 3 millenia overdue)
- Rick Santorum would have been the worst person in the world to Jane Austen too!
- Austenland: The Movie was Fun, but the Novel was Better [SPOILER ALERT as to both]
- The secret codeword Shakespeare devilishly hid in plain sight in Romeo & Juliet that Shakespeare Uncovered DIDN’T uncover—but John Milton (and then I) did!
- Veiled Allusions in Friends With Benefits--Who'd Have Thunk it?!