FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND YOUTUBE

@JaneAustenCode
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKYzhndOGsI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9WkpqjJPR4
(& scroll down to read my literary sleuthing posts)
Thanks! -- Arnie Perlstein, Portland, OR

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

THE ANSWER to my quiz for those with “Keener Penetration in discovering Merit”: the REAL “single man” of “good fortune” behind Mr. Darcy



In my quiz, I was hinting at a real person who fits ALL of the following criteria:

ONE: He was named explicitly in one of Jane Austen’s writings-like Mr. Darcy, his first name was an English name, his last name a French name. What was his name?
TWO: He owned a real life estate with spectacular vistas, that inspired Jane Austen in more than one way to create and name her most famous fictitious estate, Pemberley. What was his estate called?
THREE: He lived in close proximity to a real life sightseeing destination, with a name which Jane Austen used as the basis for a similar fictitious sightseeing location associated with the final coming together of Lizzy and Darcy. What was its name?
FOUR: He shared a hobby/skill with Darcy (D’Arcy?) and Bingley. What was that hobby/skill?
FIVE: His relationship vis a vis another man could be said to resemble that of Bingley vis a vis Darcy. Who was that other man?
SIX: He, like Darcy, is known in part for his Manners. What Manners was he known for?

The easy way to identify that real person was to recognize and Google the telltale verbiage I hid in plain sight in my Subject Line (“Keener Penetration in discovering Merit”). That leads to a notoriously sexual passage in the sixteen year old Jane Austen’s account of the reign of James 1st in her History of England:

“His Majesty was of that amiable disposition which inclines to Freindship, and in such points was possessed of a KEENER PENETRATION IN DISCOVERING MERIT than many other people. I once heard an excellent Sharade on a Carpet, of which the subject I am now on reminds me, and as I think it may afford my Readers some amusement to find it out, I shall here take the liberty of presenting it to them.
Sharade:
My first is what my second was to King James the 1st, and you tread on my whole.
The principal favourites of his Majesty were Car, who was afterwards created Earl of Somerset and whose name perhaps may have some share in the above mentioned Sharade, and George Villiers afterwards Duke of Buckingham. On his Majesty's death he was succeeded by his son Charles.”

For those who aren’t familiar with it, I recently summarized the historical accuracy and notoriety of that Sharade here….
…but today my focus is not on the King’s first “principal favourite”, Robert Car (Carr), but the second:

“GEORGE VILLIERS AFTERWARDS DUKE OF BUCKINGHAM”

I discovered this past weekend that Jane Austen was still very much focused on George Villiers 20 years after she wrote the above Sharade, when she wrote the work that defines her to the world—Pride & Prejudice! Let me walk you through the answers to my six quiz questions and show you what I mean:

CLUE #1: He was named explicitly in one of Jane Austen’s writings-like Mr. Darcy, his first name was an English name, his last name a French name. What was his name?  
ANSWER #1: GEORGE, like Fitzwilliam, is an English name; VILLIERS, like Darcy, is a French name.

CLUE #2: He owned a real life estate with spectacular vistas, that inspired Jane Austen in more than one way to create and name her most famous fictitious estate, Pemberley. What was his estate called?
CLUE #3: He lived in close proximity to a real life sightseeing destination, with a name which Jane Austen used as the basis for a similar fictitious sightseeing location associated with the final coming together of Lizzy and Darcy. What was its name?

ANSWERS #2 & #3: GEORGE VILLIERS was known for having owned two estates in Leicestershire. The first was OAKHAM Castle, which I claim was winked at by Jane Austen in the name of the site Mrs. Bennet suggests as a walking destination, after Bingley has proposed to Jane, and Darcy is getting ready to do the same with Eliza:

“As soon as they entered, Bingley looked at her so expressively, and shook hands with such warmth, as left no doubt of his good information; and he soon afterwards said aloud, "Mrs. Bennet, have you no more lanes hereabouts in which Lizzy may lose her way again to-day?"
"I advise Mr. Darcy, and Lizzy, and Kitty," said Mrs. Bennet, "to walk to OAKHAM MOUNT this morning. It is a nice long walk, and Mr. Darcy has never seen the view."
"It may do very well for the others," replied Mr. Bingley; "but I am sure it will be too much for Kitty. Won't it, Kitty?" Kitty owned that she had rather stay at home. Darcy professed a great curiosity to see THE VIEW FROM THE MOUNT, and Elizabeth silently consented…. “

The conventional scholarly wisdom is that “Oakham Mount”, with a view that Darcy is curious to see, was an imaginary place, not corresponding to any real location in England. I disagree. It’s no coincidence that within a few miles of OAKHAM Castle, there are not one but two tourist destinations with names that point to the coming together of Darcy and Eliza P&P:

First there is still a “mount” with a “view” known as Alstoe Mount at Burley, near Oakham Castle: http://abarothsworld.com/photogallery/Mount%20Alstoe/Mount%20Alstoe%20Motte1.JPG
And second there still is a very opulent estate named “Burley-on-the-Hill” also near Oakham Castle, which was acquired by George Villiers after he became very rich via his relationship with James I.
So (1) at PemBERLEY (the last two syllables of which is a perfect homonym of BURLEY), Darcy first melts Eliza’s heart with his reversal of behavior toward her, and (2) at OAKHAM MOUNT (a hybrid of OAKHAM Castle and Alstoe MOUNT) that he proposes to her! 
And that’s how I first realized that George Villiers was still on Jane Austen’s mind as she wrote P&P—and the answers to my last 3 clues point to even more “smoke” that verifies this hidden allusion in P&P.

CLUE #4: He shared a hobby/skill with Darcy (D’Arcy?) and Bingley. What was that hobby/skill?
ANSWER #4: George Villiers was a lifelong horseman in every sense of the word—a renowned rider, a breeder, acquirer, and racer of horses--a key player in the horse racing scene during James I’s reign. And guess who one of Villiers’s bosom buddies was in that horse racing scene? None other than Lord D’ARCY of the same super rich aristocratic Yorkshire family that Janine Barchas tagged in her excellent recent book Matters of Fact in Jane Austen. And, as the 1995 P&P2 illustrated (faithfully to the novel), Darcy and Bingley get around very handily on horseback.

CLUE #5: His relationship vis a vis another man could be said to resemble that of Bingley vis a vis Darcy. Who was that other man?
ANSWER #5: Here’s where some will think I go too far in my claims, but I see a very strong parallel, in terms of power relations and influence, between King James I and his longtime favourite George Villiers, on the one hand, and Darcy and his (apparently) longtime favourite Charles Bingley!
And what makes this allusion very dicey, of course, is that the obvious implication in the 16 year old Jane Austen’s History of England (verified by the historical record) is that James I and George V. were openly gay lovers. Does this mean that Darcy and Bingley were similarly gay lovers, but unknown to Elizabeth Bennet? In my opinion for the past 5 years, this is indeed a plausible reading of P&P, one that was effectively dramatized by Ann Herendeen in her slash fiction adaptation entitled  Pride/Prejudice.

CLUE #6: He, like Darcy, is known in part for his Manners. What Manners was he known for?
ANSWER #6:  This is the punning icing on the cake of the veiled allusion to George Villiers in P&P. Much is made in P&P of the manners of the three men who court Eliza in P&P. Mr. Collins’s diligently studied manners are famously phony. Darcy’s manners are awful at the beginning, but then are astonishingly transformed into perfect manners at the end. And Wickham’s manners, conversely, seem perfect when Eliza first knows him, but then seem in the end to  have all been a “sharade” (if you will), concealing his rakish intentions.

Well, I don’t believe it is a coincidence that George Villiers, when he finally bowed to the truth universally acknowledged about a man of good fortune, and went in search of a wife, wound up marrying a very rich young woman named…..Katherine MANNERS!

Cheers, ARNIE
@JaneAustenCode on Twitter

P.S.: The Pemberley-Burley allusion actually has one more wrinkle. I’ve recently suggested ….    http://sharpelvessociety.blogspot.com/2015/01/ill-humour-at-pemberley-with-darcys.html  ….that the Penshurst estate which Ben Jonson famously celebrated in a poem of that name was winked at by JA in naming Pemberley. Now I see that Pemberley is actually a hybrid name drawn from both Penshurst and Burley----both of which just happened to be estates which James I memorably visited!

Monday, August 17, 2015

A Pride & Prejudice quiz for those with Keener Penetration in discovering the Merit of a Quiz



I am thinking of a real person who fits ALL of the following criteria--see how many you can fill in (use of Google will be necessary to answer all of the numbered questions:

ONE: He was named explicitly in one of Jane Austen’s writings-like Mr. Darcy, his first name was an English name, his last name a French name. What was his name?

TWO: He owned a real life estate with spectacular vistas, that inspired Jane Austen in more than one way to create and name her most famous fictitious estate, Pemberley. What was his estate called?

THREE: He lived in close proximity to a real life sightseeing destination, with a name which Jane Austen used as the basis for a similar fictitious sightseeing location associated with the final coming together of Lizzy and Darcy. What was its name?

FOUR: He shared a hobby/skill with Darcy (D’Arcy?) and Bingley. What was that hobby/skill?

FIVE: His relationship vis a vis another man could be said to resemble that of Bingley vis a vis Darcy. Who was that other man?

SIX: He, like Darcy, is known in part for his Manners. What Manners was he known for?

I encourage you to consider these six questions as a connected group, and to make certain deductions and inferences about the various answers from considering them together.

Cheers, ARNIE
@JaneAustenCode on Twitter

Thursday, August 13, 2015

Not much ado about Lizzy’s sly notice of Darcy at Lucas Lodge


In Austen L this morning, Don Taylor wrote the following in apparent response to my very recent take on Pollock's law...
…in which I concluded that Fanny Price eavesdrops on Sir Thomas castigating Tom in their tete-a-tete early in Mansfield Park.


Don: "...I did once contribute an item on the topic of what is sometimes called Pollock's Law, namely that. Jane Austen never wrote a scene where men conversed with no women present. This topic comes back from time to time, and scenes where such  a conversation almost happens have been discussed. For instance Mansfield Park has a long conversation between Tom and Edmund about Tom's theatre project, but at the end we are told that Fanny heard it all. There is also an interview between Tom and his father about the former's debts, but it reads as a monologue, not a dialogue."

Don also wrote: "But my ancient post on Austen-L seems to have been forgotten or never registered. I pointed out that Austen did write such a scene. It is in Pride and Prejudice, chapter 6, and is a conversation between Darcy and Sir William Lucas at an impromptu dance at Lucas Lodge:
 "What a charming amusement for young people this is, Mr. Darcy! There is nothing like dancing after all. I consider it as one of the first refinements of polished society."
"Certainly, sir; and it has the advantage also of being in vogue amongst the less polished societies of the world. Every savage can dance."
Sir William only smiled. "Your friend performs delightfully," he continued after a pause, on seeing Bingley join the group; "and I doubt not that you are an adept in the science yourself, Mr. Darcy."
"You saw me dance at Meryton, I believe, sir."
"Yes, indeed, and received no inconsiderable pleasure from the sight. Do you often dance at St. James's?"
"Never, sir."
"Do you not think it would be a proper compliment to the place?"
"It is a compliment which I never pay to any place if I can avoid it."
"You have a house in town, I conclude?"
Mr. Darcy bowed.
"I had once had some thought of fixing in town myself—for I am fond of superior society; but I did not feel quite certain that the air of London would agree with Lady Lucas."
Maybe not a profound discussion, but it is a real conversation, and there is absolutely no reason to think anyone else was listening. So I point out again that Austen did write a conversation between men."

Don, I had no idea about your ancient post, thanks for reminding us all. You have certainly made a plausible argument for interpreting that scene as only involving men, but I strongly disagree with your claim that it is the only plausible reading. I.e., there is a great deal of reason to believe someone else was listening, and that "someone" is Lizzy!

Just as I argued in my post last week that there are hints suggesting that Fanny eavesdrops on Sir Thomas castigating Tom, there are hints in Chapter 6 that Eliza eavesdrops on Sir William sucking up to Darcy. First, we have the introduction of this scene:

"[Darcy] began to wish to know more of her, and as a step towards conversing with her himself, attended to her conversation with others. His doing so drew her notice. It was at Sir William Lucas's, where a large party were assembled.
"What does Mr. Darcy mean," said she to Charlotte, "by listening to my conversation with Colonel Forster?"
"That is a question which Mr. Darcy only can answer."
"But if he does it any more I shall certainly let him know that I see what he is about. He has a very satirical eye, and if I do not begin by being impertinent myself, I shall soon grow afraid of him."

This is an explicit alert that Lizzy is paying close attention to Darcy at this gathering at Lucas Lodge, in particular monitoring when he might be eavesdropping on HER! So the idea of her eavesdropping on HIM is only a small step further. Plus, as I have frequently argued, Much Ado About Nothing is a hugely significant allusive source for P&P, and eavesdropping (or “noting”), both explicit and implicit, occurs everywhere in the play—so it is JA’s punny hint in that direction when we read that Darcy’s eavesdropping drew Eliza’s NOTICE.

Then we read about Lizzie “gravely glancing at Mr. Darcy” and then clearly speaking loudly enough for Darcy to hear, "There is a fine old saying, which everybody here is of course familiar with: 'Keep your breath to cool your porridge'; and I shall keep mine to swell my song."  So, JA keeps us aware of the mutual laser focus between Lizzie and Darcy.

And then, after Mary succeeds Lizzy at the piano, we read the final lead-up to the male-to-male conversation Don has quoted:

“Mr. Darcy stood near them in silent indignation at such a mode of passing the evening, to the exclusion of all conversation, and was too much engrossed by his thoughts to perceive that Sir William Lucas was his neighbour, till Sir William thus began….”

So Darcy is “engrossed by his thoughts”, and we may fairly infer that these thoughts continue to focus on Lizzy---and, conversely, there’s no reason to believe Lizzy is not still focused on Darcy.

And finally, the end of the exchange between Sir William and Darcy is as follows:

“[Sir William] paused in hopes of an answer; but his companion [Darcy] was not disposed to make any; and Elizabeth at that instant moving towards them, he was struck with the action of doing a very gallant thing, and called out to her…”

So this brings Lizzy into the edge of the conversation, and look at what Lizzy says when Sir William takes her approach as intentionally putting her into Darcy’s line of vision:

"Indeed, sir, I have not the least intention of dancing. I entreat you not to suppose that I moved this way in order to beg for a partner."

So, just as with Fanny Price eavesdropping on Sir Thomas and Tom, there turn out to be several very pointed clues that alert us that Eliza has eavesdropped on Darcy during that conversation that Don flagged.

And therefore, as I concluded last week, Pollock’s Law continues to live!  ;)

Cheers, ARNIE
@JaneAustenCode on Twitter

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

Whit Stillman & “the right Jane Austens”



Four months ago….
… I posted about the upcoming Whit Stillman film adaptation of Jane Austen’s last completed work prior to her six published novels—the novella Lady Susan. My parting observation was: “I hope the full-bore sociopathy of Lady Susan is faithfully preserved by the cleverly subversive Whit Stillman. And I am looking forward to seeing it, with cautious optimism.”

Consider this post today a cautionary update. In my Google alert today, I read a short article in which  Stillman was recently quoted as making the following weighty pronouncement on Jane Austen's novels:

"I came late to Jane Austen. I read the wrong novel when I was in college, which was Northanger Abbey. I thought it was terrible. In Northanger Abbey, there are really two things happening: One, there's a typical Jane Austen story about characters involved in romantic situations, and maybe they're funny and maybe they're being mocked. And then you get into this tiresome parody of Gothic novels, which I don't particularly like because I don't particularly like Gothic novels. But I read the right Jane Austens after college and liked them all."

I am afraid this verdict on Northanger Abbey does not bode well for his directing of the new version of Lady Susan (bizarrely entitled Love & Friendship, which of course is the title of a different late-juvenilia story by JA). 

While anybody could initially misread a Jane Austen novel so badly and uninsightfully while in college—after all, Northanger Abbey in particular leads its unwary readers down a garden path of underestimation —its narrator spends so much time saying what Catherine is not, that most Janeites also (misguidedly) believe that NA is somehow a poor cousin of the other five Austen novels.

For examples of the hidden subtleties of Northanger Abbey, check out this sampling of posts of mine from the past several years, about the deadly serious anti-parody about the domestic everyday Gothic "horror" of everyday English marriage:

 http://sharpelvessociety.blogspot.com/2011/04/opening-pandoras-royal-box-at-abbey-in.html

 http://sharpelvessociety.blogspot.com/2012/01/byrne-portrait-two-abbeys-their-awful.html
http://sharpelvessociety.blogspot.com/2013/09/samuel-morland-general-tilney-from.html

But…for a fully grownup Stillman, a creative writer himself who has chosen to adapt a work of fiction by JA, to still have this same idea about NA decades later---and not even to have bothered, in the interim, to read up a little on NA's sophisticated, multilayered satire, both parody and anti-parody all in one----does not speak well of the sharpness of Stillman's ear for JA's infinitely subtle irony.

I guess we'll all see the result when Stillman's new film comes out, and perhaps we can still hope against hope that he ends up taking a more imaginative approach to Lady Susan (renamed Love and Friendship).

Cheers, Arnie
@JaneAustenCode on Twitter