Just as Frank playfully puts words
in Emma’s mouth at Box Hill…“…she
only demands from each of you either one thing very clever, be it prose or
verse, original or repeated—or two things moderately clever—or three things
very dull indeed, and she engages to laugh heartily at them all." …today I am presenting to you 3 passages about
“last summer” which all occur within the space of only 5 chapters of each other
in the middle of P&P, but which I bet you never connected to each other.
And then, at the end, I will pose you three questions about those passages which
I hope you will agree are at least moderately clever.
Chapter 33: [Col.
Fitzwilliam] "Care of [Bingley]! Yes, I really believe Darcy does
take care of him in those points where he most wants care. From something that
he told me in our journey hither, I have reason to think Bingley very much
indebted to him. But I ought to beg his pardon, for I have no right to suppose
that Bingley was the person meant. It was all conjecture."
"What is it you mean?"
"It is a circumstance which
Darcy could not wish to be generally known, because if it were to get round to
the lady's family, it would be an unpleasant thing."
"You may depend upon my not
mentioning it."
"And remember that I have not
much reason for supposing it to be Bingley. What he told me was merely this:
that he congratulated himself on having lately saved a friend from the
inconveniences of a most imprudent marriage, but without mentioning names or
any other particulars, and I only suspected it to be Bingley from believing him
the kind of young man to get into a scrape of that sort, and from knowing them
to have been together the whole of last summer."
"Did Mr. Darcy give you reasons
for this interference?"
"I understood that there were
some very strong objections against the lady."
"And what arts did he use to
separate them?"
"He did not talk to me of his
own arts," said Fitzwilliam, smiling. "He only told me what I have
now told you."
Elizabeth made no answer, and walked
on, her heart swelling with indignation. After watching her a little,
Fitzwilliam asked her why she was so thoughtful.
"I am thinking of what you have
been telling me," said she. "Your cousin's conduct does not suit my
feelings. Why was he to be the judge?"
"You are rather disposed to
call his interference officious?"
"I do not see what right Mr.
Darcy had to decide on the propriety of his friend's inclination, or why, upon
his own judgement alone, he was to determine and direct in what manner his
friend was to be happy. But," she continued, recollecting herself,
"as we know none of the particulars, it is not fair to condemn him. It is
not to be supposed that there was much affection in the case."
"That is not an unnatural
surmise," said Fitzwilliam, "but it is a lessening of the honour of
my cousin's triumph very sadly."
This was spoken jestingly; but it
appeared to her so just a picture of Mr. Darcy, that she would not trust
herself with an answer, and therefore, abruptly changing the conversation
talked on indifferent matters until they reached the Parsonage.”
Chapter 35: "I
must now mention a circumstance which I would wish to forget myself, and which
no obligation less than the present should induce me to unfold to any human
being. Having said thus much, I feel no doubt of your secrecy. My sister, who
is more than ten years my junior, was left to the guardianship of my mother's
nephew, Colonel Fitzwilliam, and myself. About a year ago, she was taken from
school, and an establishment formed for her in London; and last summer she went
with the lady who presided over it, to Ramsgate; and thither also went Mr.
Wickham, undoubtedly by design; for there proved to have been a prior
acquaintance between him and Mrs. Younge, in whose character we were most
unhappily deceived; and by her connivance and aid, he so far recommended
himself to Georgiana, whose affectionate heart retained a strong impression of
his kindness to her as a child, that she was persuaded to believe herself in
love, and to consent to an elopement. She was then but fifteen, which must be
her excuse; and after stating her imprudence, I am happy to add, that I owed
the knowledge of it to herself. I joined them unexpectedly a day or two before
the intended elopement, and then Georgiana, unable to support the idea of
grieving and offending a brother whom she almost looked up to as a father,
acknowledged the whole to me. You may imagine what I felt and how I acted.
Regard for my sister's credit and feelings prevented any public exposure; but I
wrote to Mr. Wickham, who left the place immediately, and Mrs. Younge was of
course removed from her charge. Mr. Wickham's chief object was unquestionably
my sister's fortune, which is thirty thousand pounds; but I cannot help
supposing that the hope of revenging himself on me was a strong inducement. His
revenge would have been complete indeed. "
Chapter
37: "Lady
Catherine seemed resigned. "Mrs. Collins, you must send a servant with
them. You know I always speak my mind, and I cannot bear the idea of two young
women travelling post by themselves. It is highly improper. You must contrive
to send somebody. I have the greatest dislike in the world to that sort of
thing. Young women should always be properly guarded and attended, according to
their situation in life. When my niece Georgiana went to Ramsgate last summer,
I made a point of her having two men-servants go with her. Miss Darcy, the daughter
of Mr. Darcy, of Pemberley, and Lady Anne, could not have appeared with
propriety in a different manner. I am excessively attentive to all those
things. You must send John with the young ladies, Mrs. Collins. I am glad it
occurred to me to mention it; for it would really be discreditable to you
to let them go alone." "
So….here
are my 3 questions for you:
ONE: The
previous summer, did Georgiana travel to Ramsgate with Anne de Bourgh and two
men-servants, as Lady Catherine tells Elizabeth in Chapter 37, or did Georgiana
go there with Mrs. Younge, as Darcy wrote to Elizabeth in Chapter 35?
[Correction added at 11:20 PM PST: When I reread my post, I realized that what appeared to me to be an inconsistency between Darcy's story about Mrs. Younge being in charge of Georgiana in Ramsgate and Lady Catherine's story about two male servants accompanying Georgiana and Anne Darcy, was not an inconsistency. I.e.., it sounds like the two male servants were sent to accompany the two girls while traveling.to Ramsgate would not have remained in Ramsgate. Instead, it would be plausible that they were also accompanied by Mrs. Young, who then would have been their sole adult supervisor in Ramsgate. This doesn't change the import of my other 2 questions, below, which I still leave out there for consideration.]
[Correction added at 11:20 PM PST: When I reread my post, I realized that what appeared to me to be an inconsistency between Darcy's story about Mrs. Younge being in charge of Georgiana in Ramsgate and Lady Catherine's story about two male servants accompanying Georgiana and Anne Darcy, was not an inconsistency. I.e.., it sounds like the two male servants were sent to accompany the two girls while traveling.to Ramsgate would not have remained in Ramsgate. Instead, it would be plausible that they were also accompanied by Mrs. Young, who then would have been their sole adult supervisor in Ramsgate. This doesn't change the import of my other 2 questions, below, which I still leave out there for consideration.]
TWO: If
Darcy and Bingley were together the whole of the previous summer when Darcy
rescued Bingley from an imprudent marriage, then how could Darcy have been
referring to his having talked Bingley out of proposing to Jane, when Bingley
didn’t even meet Jane till early October (i.e., after Michaelmas)?
THREE: For
200 years, readers of P&P have followed Elizabeth Bennet’s inference that
Fitzwilliam was talking about Darcy’s interference as Darcy describes it in his
Chapter 35 letter, which would date that interference to late November. But did
Jane Austen mean for the sharp elves who pay close attention to the above 3
passages to infer other possible, plausible interpretations of what Fitzwilliam
was talking about?
I
will wait one day for answers, and then post my interpretation(s) tomorrow
night. But one caveat: I will find it very dull indeed if anyone responds that
Jane Austen just made a mistake during all her lopping and cropping, and that
if she meant us to connect these passages, her narrator would have alerted us
to do so.
Recall
in that regard that P&P is the novel in which the narrator also fails to
ever explain to the reader the astonishing QUADRUPLE coincidence that Darcy,
Mr. Collins, & Wickham all show up in Meryton within a month of each other,
and all wind up courting the niece of Mrs. Gardiner—the coincidence being that
Wickham grew up with Darcy, Mr. Collins was given the Hunsford living by Darcy’s
aunt, and Mrs. Gardiner grew up in the shadow of Pemberley.
Either
you believe Jane Austen was a hack writer or a careless writer, or you will
take the challenge, use the old grey cells, and make sense of this mystery
hidden in plain sight by Jane Austen.
Cheers,
ARNIE
@JaneAustenCode
on Twitter
2 comments:
What if it was the interference of another imprudent marriage that Darcy saved Bingley from, and Lizzie just assumed it was her family, in that accord, I would have to quote Liv from Bride Wars words, by saying Lizzie, "you came up with that all on your own"
What if it was the interference of another imprudent marriage that Darcy saved Bingley from, and Lizzie just assumed it was her family, in that accord, I would have to quote Liv from Bride Wars words, by saying Lizzie, "you came up with that all on your own"
Post a Comment