For
those who've been following along in my latest thread which I started
earlier today under the above Subject Line, I am thrilled to be able to
present to you a response I received a short while ago in another online
discussion, written by Diana Oaks.
Diana
(who by the way did NOT ask me to write this post, it's my own idea!)
is an author of Austen sequels, and a member of Austen Authors, whose
online acquaintance I first made a month ago, and here are two links
that will tell you more about her and her writing:
And here is what Diana wrote in specific response to my above captioned post:
"Very interesting. When I read
the text, and before I scrolled down to see Arnie's answer, I arrived at the
same surprising conclusion he did. Upon reflection, it doesn't seem so
surprising at all. Not even much of a stretch.
Elizabeth
states that she arrived at her opinion of Darcy "long before" Darcy
separated Jane and Bingley. When Darcy complains of her "eager
interest" in Wickham's concerns, Elizabeth's wording is precise and does
seem to give weight to this theory. She cites his misfortunes as being a
natural source of her interest, and blames Darcy for Wickham's relative poverty
and lack of independence.
And then, another clue. When Wickham had asked
Elizabeth how long she had known Darcy, she said it was about a month. Is it
coincidence that she tells Darcy that she had not known him a month before she
knew he was the last man in the world she could be prevailed upon to marry? I
don't think so. Elizabeth herself has named the date when her dislike of Darcy
was firmly set, and it is precisely when Wickham related his
"misfortunes" to her.
We know at this time that Wickham had turned her
head in a big way, as the next few chapters are full of Elizabeth's feelings
for Wickham. It is obvious that she blames Darcy for Wickham's circumstances
and prospects, which, by Wickham's account should have been better - good
enough for him to have a living in the church that would be sufficient to
support a wife, a fact which was shortly afterward illustrated by Mr. Collins'
ability to overlook the lack of a dowry when selecting a wife.
I'm inclined to agree that Elizabeth blamed Darcy
that Wickham, who she had truly fancied, wasn't in a position to propose to
her. Marriage was her eager interest in Wickham, and she believed that his lack
of money was to blame for her disappointed hopes."
I
of course was thrilled to receive a response like that, from a reader
of P&P who was surprised to find that she found my argument
convincing. And note that Diana also picked up on yet another clue (the
part about the "month" before Elizabeth knew Darcy would never be her
husband coinciding with the very moment when Wickham first told her his
tale of woe about Darcy) that shows what a subtle but pervasive effect
Elizabeth's feelings for Wickham have on the way she sees the
world---until everything shifts, and then it is Elizabeth's feelings for
Darcy which color her world.
Maybe
one moral of this story is that Elizabeth ought to try living her life
without depending on ANY man to color her world, perhaps she'd see the
world--and in particular, men----more clearly and dispassionately.
Cheers, ARNIE
@JaneAustenCode on Twitter
Popular Posts
- Deirdre Le Faye & Me: "I am a scholar, she is a scholar: so far we are equal"
- Darcy's "We neither of us perform to strangers": a Radical New Interpretation
- The Hunger Games’s Veiled Allusion to Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus
- Rick Santorum would have been the worst person in the world to Jane Austen too!
- August Wayne Booth in Once Upon A Time: Jane Austen Really IS Everywhere in 2012!
- 20 shades of hero/villain Mr. Darcy
- Can Jane Austen forgive Marianne?
- The Great Gadsby: an overnight lesbian feminist ‘comedy’ sensation 10+ years in the making (& 3 millenia overdue)
- Austenland: The Movie was Fun, but the Novel was Better [SPOILER ALERT as to both]
- Miss Bennet, Elizabeth, Lizzy, Eliza: who calls her what....and why
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment