In
Janeites and Austen L, Diane Reynolds wrote the following earlier today:
"I
find it interesting that James died only a few years after Jane Austen and that
Henry knew by autumn, 1817 that James was, in fact, dying. I wonder if it was a
similar malady, given that the Addison disease diagnosis
for JA is speculative. Henry does sound like Mary Crawford ..."
Yes,
Diane, Henry Austen does sound like Mary Crawford when he licks his chops at
the prospect of another person's death giving him a benefit, but otherwise, the
better fit, to me, for Henry Austen is Edmund Bertram, not Mary Crawford.
Edmund,
as I have often written, is very much a self-deceiving hypocrite and spineless
weasel, and it is in fact he who _actually_ benefits from the death of another
clergyman, which allows him to suddenly and conveniently
succeed to a lucrative living. And, also like Henry Austen's deathly fantasy,
it is not a stranger who dies, it is someone well known to him--Dr. Grant, the
longtime clergyman at Mansfield Park, and the _brother_ (in law) of the woman
Edmund wanted to marry.
And
here's the best (or worst) part---the woman Edmund wanted to marry is of course
Mary Crawford, who is, as everyone knows, strongly modeled on Eliza Hancock
Austen, Henry Austen’s first wife, who
died just before JA began to write Mansfield Park! (and, as I've suggested
before, that means Admiral Crawford is modeled on Warren Hastings!)
So,
no wonder Henry Austen made such a big deal in his Biographical Notice that
Jane Austen did not have real people in mind when she wrote her characters--it
was his life most of all which was on display in MP!
Jane
Austen was a true mentalist, she had everyone around her pegged...
Speaking
of which, I was thinking some more about the two Mrs. Norrises, and realized
how it relates to this modeling of MP's characters on the Austen family:
Who
are the two Mrs. Norrises?
First,
the bad one we all know; and
Second,
the good one of whom Anielka Briggs gave the world its first glimpse a few
years ago.
Then
I, two weeks ago, added another significant wrinkle, and some strong textual
underpinning, to that glimpse, when I
wrote, in relevant part, about Mrs. Norris channeling the good Cottager's Wife
from Lover's Vows, when Mrs. Norris chimes in to pressure Fanny to play that
very same part:
"If
we merely go by the words she speaks and their apparent literal meaning, then
Mrs. Norris is being horrible to Fanny, trying to make her feel guilty about
something that should be Fanny’s perfect right as a young
adult with a mind of her own; i.e., not to perform in a play if it would be
upsetting for her to do so, as would clearly be the case here.
But…if
we go by the effect of what Mrs. Norris says, it takes on a whole different
meaning. Or, put another way, in light of Michael Chwe’s new book Jane Austen
Game Theorist, what if we look at Mrs. Norris as being concerned only with the
outcome or end she achieves for Fanny, regardless of the means Mrs. Norris has
to employ, thinking outside the box, in order to achieve it.
In
this case, the effect of Mrs. Norris’s intervention is immediate and decisive.
The rest of the family backs off at once, and leaves Fanny in peace. And then
they don’t revisit it again for a while—and then, only re-present the request
to Fanny in a blunted form that Fanny actually can tolerate—even though she
never does wind up having to do it at all—but I think Fanny has Tom to thank
for that, not Mrs. Norris.
So in
the end of the day, in a strange way, Mrs. Norris has “saved” Fanny—and is
willing not only to be thanked for it ten thousand times, but to be thought of
very badly by the rest of the family for her ogre-like behavior toward Fanny.
And
doesn’t that make Mrs. Norris a great deal like the selfless, generous Cottager’s
Wife in Lovers Vows? And that, I suggest, is exactly what Jane Austen was
“telling” us by having Mrs. Norris speak the very same words that Cottager’s
Wife spoke! And then adding to the juicy covert irony of it all, by having Mrs.
Norris echo Cottager’s Wife in the very words Mrs. Norris speaks which enable
Fanny to avoid playing the role she so desperately seeks to avoid playing, that
of Cottager’s Wife!" END OF QUOTE FROM MY OWN PRIOR BLOG POST
And
that brings me to the Austen family business in all of this---this dichotomy
between two alternative versions of Mrs. Norris can be related directly to the
Austens in a very intriguing way.
First,
the bad Mrs. Norris is Mary Lloyd Austen, who marries a clergyman, and abuses
Fanny Price (representing Anna Austen) the girl who is brought under her care
at a young age.
But...
Second,
the good Mrs. Norris is Jane Austen, who is unmarried, who occasionally says
bad things about her niece (again, Anna Austen), but who does it for that
niece's benefit--as I have previously suggested, JA several times wrote
judgmental things about Anna Austen in letters to Fanny Knight, but JA did this
so that Fanny would not be jealous of Anna, and therefore Fanny, the heiress,
would be nicer to Anna when Jane was dead and could no longer watch out for
Anna.
Boy,
Jane Austen's acumen, imagination and foresight were all unsurpassed!
Cheers,
ARNIE
@JaneAustenCode
on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment